How to Conduct and Publish Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Por um escritor misterioso
Descrição
In the age of digital information overload, clinicians are faced with a daily influx of information to parse through. It becomes an impossible task to read every new study in their field, make sense of the results, and apply the findings to patient care. Evidence summaries called systematic reviews have become the cornerstone to informing […]
The age of abundant scholarly information and its synthesis– A time when 'just google it' is no longer enough - Gusenbauer - 2021 - Research Synthesis Methods - Wiley Online Library
A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research
JCM, Free Full-Text
The difference between a systematic review and a meta-analysis - Covidence
Using Lens.org to find reviews of topics you are researching
How to Conduct and Publish Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses - Penn Dental Medicine
Deirdre Tobias, ScD on X: Transparent & rigorous *systematic reviews* (w/ or w/o meta-analysis) are essential to properly synthesize multiple sources and types of evidence. Without them, causal conclusions are out of
Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry – topic of research paper in Health sciences. Download scholarly article PDF
Adding transparency and reproducibility to your literature searches
A step by step guide how to conduct a meta analysis and systematic review
Sex Differences in Presentation of Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the medical sciences: Best practice methods for research syntheses